Attempt to get copyright on wholly AI-generated art gunned down by US Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear a case concerning copyright for AI-generated art, upholding previous rulings that human authorship is a requirement. This decision impacts the ability to copyright works created by AI systems like Stephen Thaler's DABUS, with potential consequences for AI development in the creative industry. The article also touches on related patent issues and the broader debate around intellectual property in the age of generative AI, noting a lawsuit by Ziff Davis against OpenAI.
- Entities
- Company: Ziff Davis
- Person: Stephen Thaler
- Topic: Artificial Intelligence
- Person: Sam Altman
- Company: OpenAI
- Topic: Copyright Law
- Company: NetEase Games
This article was reported and published by rockpapershotgun.com. feed.gg links to it as part of a story cluster — full text, images and rights remain with the publisher.