Ethics in Gaming
Ongoing coverage on Ethics in Gaming.
Latest coverage
Future? No Thanks! dev removes AI-generated voices from game and offers refunds to players who feel "betrayed"
Molleindustria developer Paolo Pedercini has updated Future? No Thanks! to remove AI-generated voices and is offering refunds to players who feel betrayed by their use. Pedercini disclosed the use of generative AI for robot voices, intended as a spoof, but faced backlash on social media. He plans for his next game to be entirely hand-coded.
Why I Play: Palworld gives us the weird, uncomfortable reality of a mature Pokemon title – on purpose
This opinion piece explores how Palworld intentionally leans into comparisons with Pokemon by presenting a more mature take on creature collection and utilization. The author argues that Palworld's design choices, such as the juxtaposition of cute creatures with realistic weaponry and industrial labor, force players to confront the ethical implications of such systems, which the Pokemon series avoids. The game's friction stems from its deliberate engagement with these uncomfortable realities, prompting reflection on player desires for mature gaming experiences.
